The SQuID protocol (subcutaneous insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis): Impacts on ED operational metrics

Author:

Griffey Richard T.1ORCID,Schneider Ryan M.1,Girardi Margo2,Yeary Julianne3,McCammon Craig3,Frawley Laura3,Ancona Rachel1,Cruz‐Bravo Paulina2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri USA

2. Department of Internal Medicine Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri USA

3. Barnes‐Jewish Hospital Emergency Department Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundStudies using fast‐acting subcutaneous (SQ) insulin analogs in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and cost‐effectiveness, allowing treatment of mild‐to‐moderate (MTM)‐severity DKA patients in non–intensive care unit (ICU) settings. However, emergency department (ED)‐based studies are few, with limited exploration of impacts on operational metrics.MethodsWe implemented the SQuID (Subcutaneous Insulin in Diabetic Ketoacidosis) protocol for adults with MTM‐severity DKA in an urban academic ED, collecting data from August 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. We examined fidelity (frequency of required q2h glucose checks), safety (proportion of patients administered rescue dextrose for hypoglycemia), and ED length of stay (EDLOS) for the SQuID cohort compared to patients (non‐ICU) treated with a traditional insulin infusion. We also examined ICU admission rate among MTM‐severity DKA patients after introduction of SQuID to two historical control periods (pre‐intervention and pre‐COVID). We used Mann–Whitney U to test for differences in EDLOS distributions, bootstrapped (n = 1000) confidence intervals (CIs) for EDLOS median differences, and the two‐sample z‐test for differences in ICU admissions.ResultsWe identified 177 MTM‐severity DKA patients in the study period (78 SQuID, 99 traditional cohort) and 163 preintervention and 161 pre‐COVID historical control patients. Fidelity to the SQuID pathway was good, with glucose checks exceeding the q2‐h requirement. We found no difference in the proportion of rescue dextrose administration compared to the traditional pathway. We observed significant reductions in median EDLOS for the SQuID cohort compared to the traditional cohort during the study period (−3.0, 95% CI −8.5 to −1.4), the preintervention period (−1.4, 95% CI −3.1 to −0.1), and the pre‐COVID control period (−3.6, 95% CI −7.5 to −1.8).ConclusionsIn this single‐center study at an academic ED, treatment of patients with MTM‐severity DKA with a SQ insulin protocol was effective, demonstrated equivalent safety, and reduced ED length of stay.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2. Diabetic emergencies — ketoacidosis, hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state and hypoglycaemia

3. PreventionCFDCA.National Diabetes Statistics Report: coexisting conditions and complications. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. October 28 2021. Accessed February 21  2023.https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics‐report/coexisting‐conditions‐complications.html

4. Health Care Utilization and Burden of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in the U.S. Over the Past Decade: A Nationwide Analysis

5. Can we prevent diabetic ketoacidosis in children?;Bismuth E;Pediatr Diabetes,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3