Overarching Priorities for Health and Care Research in the United Kingdom: A Coproduced Synthesis of James Lind Alliance ‘Top 10s’

Author:

Crocker Joanna C.1ORCID,Moore Lucy1ORCID,Ogden Margaret2,Crowe Sally3,Khan Maaz45ORCID,Schoemaker Casper6ORCID,Roy Noémi B. A.5,Taylor Mark7,Gronlund Toto8,Bueser Teofila9,Tatum Madeline10,Davies Benjamin11,Finlay Teresa1

Affiliation:

1. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

2. Lay Partner County Durham UK

3. Crowe Associates Oxfordshire UK

4. School of Clinical Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

5. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK

6. University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands

7. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Coordinating Centre Southampton UK

8. James Lind Alliance Southampton UK

9. South East Genomic Medicine Service Alliance Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK

10. Formerly Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Oxford UK

11. Department of Academic Neurosurgery University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionJames Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) produce ‘Top 10’ lists of health and care research priorities through a structured, shared decision‐making process with patients or service users, carers and health or care professionals who identify questions that are most important to them. To date, over 150 PSPs in different areas of health and care have published research priorities. Some PSPs share similar priorities, which could be combined, promoted and addressed through collaborative research to increase value and reduce research waste.AimThe aim of this study was to identify overarching themes common to JLA PSP priorities across different areas of health and care.MethodsOur analysis included ‘Top 10’ research priorities produced by UK‐based JLA PSPs between 2016 and 2020. The priorities were coded deductively by the Health Research Classification System (HRCS) health category and research activity. We then carried out online workshops with patients, service users and carers to generate new codes not already captured by this framework. Within each code, multistakeholder inductive thematic analysis was used to identify overarching themes, defined as encompassing priorities from three or more PSPs covering two or more health categories. We used codesign methods to produce an interactive tool for end users to navigate the overarching themes.ResultsFive hundred and fifteen research priorities from 51 PSPs were included in our analysis. The priorities together encompassed 20 of 21 HRCS health categories, the most common being ‘generic health relevance’ (22%), ‘mental health’ (18%) and ‘musculoskeletal’ (14%). We identified 89 overarching themes and subthemes, which we organised into a hierarchy with seven top‐level themes: quality of life, caregivers and families, causes and prevention, screening and diagnosis, treatment and management, services and systems and social influences and impacts.ConclusionThere are many overarching themes common to research priorities across multiple areas of health and care. To facilitate new research and research funding, we have developed an interactive tool to help researchers, funders and patients or service users to explore these priority topics. This is freely available to download online.Patient or Public ContributionPatients or service users and carers were involved throughout the study, including deciding the aims, designing the study, analysing priorities to identify themes, interpreting and reporting the findings.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3