‘Not a goal, but a given’: Neonatal care participation through parents' perspective, a cross‐sectional study

Author:

Hoeben Hannah12ORCID,Obermann‐Borst Sylvia A.3,Stelwagen Mireille A.1,van Kempen Anne A. M. W.1,van Goudoever Johannes B.2,van der Schoor Sophie R. D.14,van Veenendaal Nicole R.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology OLVG Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Emma Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Care4Neo, Neonatal Patient and Parent Advocacy Organization Rotterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Neonatology Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore parents' perspectives regarding participation in neonatal care, with focus on the family integrated care (FICare) model utilised as a tool to enhance parent–infant closeness. Additionally, we describe experiences in different architectural settings.MethodsAn online survey, categorised by four FICare pillars, was distributed through social media to parents of newborns hospitalised to Dutch neonatal wards between 2015 and 2020. Quantitative findings were summarised using descriptive statistics, while open‐ended responses were thematically analysed.ResultsAmong the 344 respondents (98% mothers), most reported feeling involved in care (315/340). However, 79% also felt separated from their infant (265/337). Irrespective of architectural settings, parents reported incomplete implementation of FICare pillars: 14% was invited to educational sessions (parent education), 51% discussed family‐specific care plans (staff education), 21% was facilitated in connecting with veteran parents (psychosocial support) and 22% received couplet‐care (environment). Although 65% of parents were invited to attend clinical rounds, 32% actively participated in decision making. Thematic analysis revealed fundamentals for feeling welcome on the ward, peer‐to‐peer support, psychosocial support and participation in clinical rounds.ConclusionOverall, parents expressed satisfaction with participation in neonatal care. However, structural implementation of FICare lacks. Regardless of architecture, expanding parent participation beyond presence requires attention.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3