How rural is All of Us? Comparing characteristics of rural participants in the National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program to other national data sources

Author:

Graves Janessa M.12ORCID,Beese Shawna R.23ORCID,Abshire Demetrius A.4ORCID,Bennett Kevin J.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. WWAMI Rural Health Research Center Department of Family Medicine School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. College of Nursing Washington State University Spokane Washington USA

3. College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Extension Washington State University Pullman Washington USA

4. College of Nursing University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA

5. University of South Carolina School of Medicine‐Columbia Columbia South Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program represents a national effort to develop a database to advance health research, especially among individuals historically underrepresented in research, including rural populations. The purpose of this study was to describe the rural populations identified in the All of Us Research Program using the only proxy measure currently available in the dataset.MethodsCurrently, the All of Us Research Program provides a proxy measure of rurality that identifies participants who self‐reported delaying care due to far travel distances associated with living in rural areas. Using the All of Us Controlled Tier Dataset v6, we compared sociodemographic and health characteristics of All of Us rural participants identified via this proxy to rural US residents from nationally representative data sources using chi‐squared tests.Results3.1% of 160,880 All of Us participants were rural, compared to 15%‐20% of US residents based on commonly accepted rural definitions. Proportionally more rural All of Us participants reported fair or poor health status, history of cancer, and history of heart disease (P<.01).ConclusionsThe All of Us measure may capture a subset of underserved participants who live in rural areas and experience health care access barriers due to distance. Researchers who use this proxy measure to characterize rurality should interpret their findings with caution due to differences in population and health characteristics using this proxy measure rural compared to other commonly used rural definitions.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference44 articles.

1. Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us Research Program: a scoping review;Mapes BM;PLoS One,2020

2. The “All of Us” Research Program;Denny JC;N Engl J Med,2019

3. National Institutes of Health.All of Us Research Hub. Data Snapshots.2023. Accessed May 31 2023.https://researchallofus.org/data‐tools/data‐snapshots/

4. Barriers to clinical trial participation: a comparison of rural and urban communities in South Carolina;Kim SH;J Community Health,2014

5. A decade of nutrition and health disparities research at NIH, 2010–2019;Brown AGM;Am J Prev Med,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3