Balancing Interests of Science, Scientists, and the Publishing Business

Author:

Balogh Lajos P1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Precision Nanomedicine

Abstract

In the closely coupled system of diverse interests of science, those of scientists (authors, reviewers, and readers), their organizations (universities, research institutions) and those of publishers, every component is undergoing major changes in the digital era. In reality, these interests are deeply interconnected and long-term dominance of any one of them could hinder progress in many different ways. For science, originality and novelty do not have merit without reproducibility; for scientists, quantity is not a substitute for quality, and if businesses focus only on profit, it will suppress the value of their publications. Science, scientists, and organizations not only coexist, but _cannot exist_ without each other, therefore all participants must adjust their actions to avoid devaluation of the whole. Many efforts are underway to regain this balance, and one possible approach – ours at Precision Nanomedicine – is described here.

Publisher

Andover House Inc

Subject

General Medicine

Reference68 articles.

1. G. Unwin, S. P. Unwin and D. H. Tucker, "History of Publishing," Encyclopædia Britannica, inc., 8 March 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/topic/publishing. [Accessed 14 March 2018].

2. "Philosophical Transactions," 6 March 1665. [Online]. Available: http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org. [Accessed 28 February 2018].

3. R. K. Bluhm, "Henry Oldenburg, F. R. S. (c.1615-1677)," 1 July 1960. [Online]. Available: http://rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/15/1/183. [Accessed 28 February 2018].

4. L. R. Patterson, in Copyright in Historical Perspective, Patterson, Vanderbilt Univ. Press, 1968, pp. 136-137.

5. T. Delamothe and R. Smith, "Open access publishing takes off," The BMJ, vol. 328, no. 7430, pp. 1-3, 3 January 2004.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3