Possibilities and Approaches of European Court of Human Rights and Court of Justice of the European Union in Fundamental Rights Protection in the Context of Environmental Litigation

Author:

Lazorčáková TímeaORCID

Abstract

Two judicial bodies, but both without right to protect the environment established. This is also how the coexistence of the two important judicial bodies located in the European area could be briefly characterized. The European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union were created for different purposes, but their jurisprudence in the area of environmental protection and the protection of people's lives and health from the negative consequences of climate change overlap more than it might seem at first sight. We find certain similarities in terms of ensuring a certain degree of protection of fundamental rights in the context of the environment. The European Court of Human Rights has a priority in terms of the protection of fundamental rights in Europe, but in the field of the environment it faces several problems. Especially when we are talking about the protection of rights for future generations, where there is no direct victim or direct violation of fundamental rights, only a very high risk of their violation. On the other hand, the Court of Justice of the European Union has a much greater assumption of effectiveness, which has the potential to change the legislation of the member states and thereby indirectly ensure the protection of people's lives and health. Recently, the activity of the European Commission has been increasing in the interest of achieving climate neutrality, and this also means greater pressure on the states in the interest of the complete and correct transposition of European regulations in the field of the environment. In case of deficiencies, the European Commission can intervene by filing a lawsuit according to Article 258 of the TFEU, and achieve the required remedy. Although, such a procedure is not primarily aimed at the protection of fundamental rights, the positive impact on their protection cannot be neglected.

Funder

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja

Publisher

Comenius University in Bratislava

Subject

Microbiology

Reference37 articles.

1. Carême v. France (2021). In: Climate Change Litigation Databases. Available at: http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/careme-v-france/ (accessed on 31.10.2023).

2. De Conto v. Italy and 32 other States (2021). In: Climate Change Litigation Databases. Available at: http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/de-conto-v-italy-and-32-other-states/ (accessed on 31.10.2023).

3. De Schutter, O. (2017). Infringement Proceedings as a Tool for the Enforcement of Fundamental Rights in the European Union. Brussel: Open Society European Policy Institute. Available at: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/f637765b-ee20-4e6e-9cda-b74151f9a369/infringement-proceedings-as-tool-for-enforcement-of-fundamental-rights-in-eu-20171214.pdf (accessed on 31.10.2023).

4. Engels and Others v. Germany (2022). In: Climate Change Litigation Databases. Available at: http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/engels-and-others-v-germany/ (accessed on 31.10.2023).

5. Greenpeace Nordic and Others v. Norway (2021). In: Climate Change Litigation Databases. Available at: http://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/greenpeace-nordic-assn-v-ministry-of-petroleum-and-energy-ecthr/ (accessed on 31.10.2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3