Abstract
The paper deals with the methods of seizure of property in criminal proceedings and with the individual institutes that may be used for this purpose. This is a form of vademecum of the financial investigation, which is currently one of the priorities of criminal policy. The paper responds to the latest development of the decision-making activities of the courts and tries to point out to certain stereotypes that are already outworn by the decision-making activities in selected decisions.
Funder
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
Publisher
Comenius University in Bratislava
Reference27 articles.
1. Banerjee, R. (n.d.). Factors that facilitated and sponsored the explosion of money laundering. Retrieved from http://people.exeter.ac.uk/watupman/undergrad/ron/explosion of money laundering.htm (accesed on: 27.10.2021).
2. Borlini, L. S., and Montanaro, F. (2017). The Evolution of the EU Law Against Criminal Finance: The ‘Hardening’ of FATF Standards within the EU. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 48, pp. 1009–1062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3010099
3. Čentéš, J., and Beleš, A. (2018). Regulation of agent as a tool for combating organized crime. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), pp. 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.8.2(3)
4. Dion, M. (2015). Is money laundering an ethical issue? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 18(4), pp. 425–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2014-0018
5. European Commission (2019). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the assessment of the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting the internal market and relating to cross-border activities. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/supranational_risk_assessment_of_the_money_laundering_and_terrorist_financing_risks_affecting_the_union.pdf (accesed on: 27.10.2021).