Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the advantages and challenges of analyzing post-blast pyrotechnic pipe bombs using a combination of light microscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Two simulated improvised explosive devices (IEDs) were constructed and exploded using pyrotechnics as the main charge and consisted of several different components to simulate common materials that might be found in authentic bombing scenarios. In order to develop a rapid explosives residue recovery technique, a wet and dry swabbing process was compared to determine the most efficient swabbing method of recovery for inorganic oxidizers in post-blast debris. Samples were recrystallized using a water recrystallization method followed by in situ analysis using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and micro-Raman spectroscopy, targeting euhedral and subhedral crystals. While the water recrystallization had effects on the resulting Raman spectrum, such as peak intensity reduction, ultimately, the final salt identifications were not affected. The detection of several inorganic oxidizers post-blast included the identification of potassium perchlorate (KClO4), potassium nitrate (KNO3), and barium nitrate (Ba(NO3)2). The detection of KNO3 using microscopy alone was more challenging due to its relatively low abundance compared to KClO4 but was achieved with micro-Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, the mixing of inorganic oxidizers within single crystals was also observed. The results indicated that the combined approach of microscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy enabled the successful detection of inorganic oxidizing salts in a post-blast scenario, as well as describing the advantages and limitations of this combination of techniques.
Publisher
McCrone Research Institute, Inc.
Reference33 articles.
1. 1. United States Bomb Data Center. United States Bomb Data Center (USBDC) Explosives Incident Re¬port (EIR) 2022, Annual Explosives Incident Report, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives: Redstone Arsenal, AL, 2022; https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/docs/report/2022-explosives-incident-report-eir/download.
2. 2. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Ex¬plosives, "Fireworks"; https://www.atf.gov/explo-sives/fireworks (accessed May 20, 2024).
3. 3. Conkling, J.A. and Mocella, C.J. Chemistry of Pyrotechnics: Basic Principles and Theory, Third Edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton (FL), London, New York, 2019.
4. 4. Martín-Alberca, C. and García-Ruiz, C. "Ana¬lytical Techniques for the Analysis of Consumer Fire¬works," TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 56, pp 27-36, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2013.12.010.
5. 5. Sabatini, J.J. "A Review of Illuminating Pyrotech¬nics," Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 43:1, pp 28-37; https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201700189.