The influence of ultrasound image depth and gain on skeletal muscle echo intensity

Author:

Girts Ryan M.12,Harmon Kylie K.12,Pagan Jason I.12,Alberto Ariel12,Hernandez Manuel G.12,Stock Matt S.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neuromuscular Plasticity Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

2. School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Abstract

Echo intensity may associate with indicators of skeletal muscle quality, but investigators often use different methodological approaches that may alter echo intensity when acquiring B-mode ultrasound images. We examined the influence of image depth and gain settings on the interpretation of echo intensity. Thirty-six college-aged males and females participated. Ultrasound images of the vastus lateralis were captured in the sagittal plane. Images were captured at depths of 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 cm and gain settings of 50 and 60 dB in random order. For both gain settings, echo intensity values were similar between 4.0 and 6.0 cm. At a gain of 50 dB, 7.0 cm demonstrated greater values than all other depths. At a gain of 60 dB, 7.0 cm displayed greater values compared to all other depths, but 3.0 cm displayed lower echo intensity values than other depths. Echo intensity was substantially higher when using a gain of 60 dB compared to 50 dB (mean difference ≥ 21.7 arbitrary units, d ≥ 3.47). When planning investigations in new research areas, researchers should carefully consider their study-specific image depth. Echo intensity values are stable between depths of 4.0 and 6.0 cm, suggesting that changing image depth may not be problematic. Image gain must be kept constant. Novelty: Optimal approaches for B-mode ultrasound image acquisition of skeletal muscles remain unclear. Echo intensity is similar between depths of 4.0 and 6.0 cm, regardless of image gain. Investigators should seek to utilize a constant depth setting, but small deviations may be acceptable.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Physiology (medical),Nutrition and Dietetics,Physiology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3