Exercise snacks are a time-efficient alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training for improving cardiorespiratory fitness but not maximal fat oxidation in inactive adults: a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Yin Mingyue1ORCID,Deng Shengji1,Chen Zhili1,Zhang Boyi2,Zheng Huakun3,Bai Mingyang3,Li Hansen4,Zhang Xing5,Deng Jianfeng1,Liu Qian3,Little Jonathan P.6ORCID,Li Yongming17

Affiliation:

1. School of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China

2. Department of Physical Education, Exercise and Health Technology Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

3. School of Physical Education, Sichuan Agriculture University, Yaan, China

4. Department of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

5. Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

6. School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, Canada

7. China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China

Abstract

The aims of this study were (1) to determine how stair-climbing-based exercise snacks (ES) compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and (2) to explore whether ES could improve maximal fat oxidation rate (MFO) in inactive adults. Healthy, young, inactive adults ( n: 42, age: 21.6 ± 2.3 years, BMI: 22.5 ± 3.6 kg·m−2, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak): 33.6 ± 6.3 mL·kg−1·min−1) were randomly assigned to ES, MICT, or Control. ES ( n = 14) and MICT ( n = 13) groups performed three sessions per week over 6 weeks, while the control group ( n = 15) maintained their habitual lifestyle. ES involved 3 × 30 s “all-out” stair-climbing (6 flight, 126 steps, and 18.9 m total height) bouts separated by >1 h rest, and MICT involved 40 min × 60%–70% HRmax stationary cycling. A significant group × time interaction was found for relative VO2peak ( p < 0.05) with ES significantly increasing by 7% compared to baseline (MD = 2.5 mL·kg−1·min−1 (95% CI = 1.2, 3.7), Cohen’s d = 0.44), while MICT had no significant effects (MD = 1.0 mL·kg−1·min−1 (−1.1, 3.2), Cohen’s d = 0.17), and Control experienced a significant decrease (MD = −1.7 mL·kg−1·min−1 (−2.9, −0.4), Cohen’s d = 0.26). MFO was unchanged among the three groups (group × time interaction, p > 0.05 for all). Stair climbing-based ES are a time-efficient alternative to MICT for improving CRF among inactive adults, but the tested ES intervention appears to have limited potential to increase MFO.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3