Comparison of staircase and asymmetrical before–after, control–impact (aBACI) experimental designs to test the effectiveness of stream restoration at increasing juvenile steelhead density

Abstract

Before–after, control–impact (BACI) experimental designs are commonly used in large-scale environmental experiments, but these designs can be confounded by location and time interactions. Staircase designs, where replicate treatments are staggered temporally, have been suggested as an alternative to BACI designs. We performed a simulation study based on data from an ongoing watershed-scale restoration experiment within three streams to test the effectiveness of adding large wood to increase habitat complexity and abundance and productivity of juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). We compared the power of two asymmetric BACI (aBACI) designs with two staircase designs for detecting changes in the density of steelhead (fish·m–2). A staircase design where treatments were temporally staggered in one treatment section in each stream had the highest power and best precision, especially when the innate spatial and temporal variances of steelhead density were large. A traditional BACI performed the worst, and a variation on another BACI and staircase design had intermediate performance. Multistream staircase designs are also more logistically and economically feasible and can maximize learning by replicating experiments across different stream types.