Evaluating trade-offs in bull trout reintroduction strategies using structured decision making

Author:

Brignon William R.12,Peterson James T.2,Dunham Jason B.3,Schaller Howard A.4,Schreck Carl B.2

Affiliation:

1. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, 1211 SE Cardinal Court, Suite 100, Vancouver, WA 98683, USA.

2. Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, US Geological Survey, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, 104 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-3803, USA.

3. US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 Southwest Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

4. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Aquatic Conservation Program, Pacific Regional Office, 911 NE 1st Avenue, Portland 97232, USA.

Abstract

Structured decision making allows reintroduction decisions to be made despite uncertainty by linking reintroduction goals with alternative management actions through predictive models of ecological processes. We developed a decision model to evaluate the trade-offs between six bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) reintroduction decisions with the goal of maximizing the number of adults in the recipient population without reducing the donor population to an unacceptable level. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the decision identity and outcome were most influenced by survival parameters that result in increased adult abundance in the recipient population, increased juvenile survival in the donor and recipient populations, adult fecundity rates, and sex ratio. The decision was least sensitive to survival parameters associated with the captive-reared population, the effect of naivety on released individuals, and juvenile carrying capacity of the reintroduced population. The model and sensitivity analyses can serve as the foundation for formal adaptive management and improved effectiveness, efficiency, and transparency of bull trout reintroduction decisions.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference59 articles.

1. Understanding the Significance of Redd Counts: A Comparison between Two Methods for Estimating the Abundance of and Monitoring Bull Trout Populations

2. Optimal Exploitation Strategies for an Animal Population in a Markovian Environment: A Theory and an Example

3. Barrows, M., Koch, R.C., Johnson, J., Koski, M.L., and Bailey, E. 2016. Clackamas River bull trout reintroduction project, 2015 annual report. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fisheries Program Office, Vancouver, Wash., and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis, Ore.

4. Bellman, R. 1957. Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

5. Competitive ability and social behaviour of juvenile steelhead reared in enriched and conventional hatchery tanks and a stream environment

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3