Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
2. Department of Botany, The University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Abstract
Variation in floral form complicates species identification, and when variation in ploidy also occurs, taxonomic designations are significantly compromised. We studied morphological and ploidy variation in sister species Collinsia parviflora Lindl. (small-flowered form) and Collinsia grandiflora Douglas ex Lindl. (large-flowered form), sampling from California, where the species were previously described as diploids, to British Columbia, where morphologically variable populations were more recently designated tetraploid. We found continuous among-population variation in flower size and shape throughout our sampled range. Ploidy variation, estimated using a combination of chromosome counts and flow cytometry, was not associated with flower size. Diploid populations were rare, and both large-flowered and small-flowered diploids were identified. Tetraploid populations were common, geographically dispersed, and exhibited the full range of flower sizes. A few populations of small-flowered plants were putative hexaploids. When large- and small-flowered forms co-occurred, they were diploid and tetraploid, respectively, suggesting morphological differentiation from selection for reproductive isolation between co-occurring plants of different ploidy. Although diploid C. parviflora (small-flowered) and C. grandiflora (large-flowered) occur, the majority of our sample consisted of morphologically variable tetraploids, suggesting that the use of flower size to delineate species is inappropriate. Further research is needed to ensure a true description of species boundaries in this group.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献