A comparison of methods for total sulphur analysis of tree foliage

Abstract

Three methods were compared for total sulphur analysis of tree foliage: magnesium nitrate ashing followed by turbidimetry, sodium hypobromite (NaOBr) oxidation followed by colorimetry, and an instrumental method using the Fisher S analyser, model 475. The latter method was found to be substantially better than the other methods with respect to accuracy and speed of analysis, and of satisfactory precision (average coefficient of variation (CV) was 2.5%). Dry ashing resulted in good precision (CV = 1.9%) but only recovered 76% of the reported total S in the United States National Bureau of Standards (NBS) orchard leaf standard. The NaOBr method recovered 88% of reported S from the NBS standard but showed poorer precision (CV = 4.5%). The Fisher analyser had the lowest operating cost per sample, largely owing to lower labour costs.