Adjustment for gas exchange threshold enhances precision of heart rate-derived VO2 estimates during heavy exercise

Author:

Pettitt Robert W.1234,Symons J. David1234,Taylor Julie E.1234,Eisenman Patricia A.1234,White Andrea T.1234

Affiliation:

1. California State University, Fresno, 5275 North Campus Drive M/S SG28, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.

2. University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

3. Southern Utah University, 351 West University Boulevard, Cedar City, UT 84720, USA.

4. University of Utah School of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

Abstract

Overestimates of oxygen uptake (VO2) are derived from the heart rate reserve – VO2 reserve (HRR–VO2R) model. We tested the hypothesis that adjusting for differences above and below gas exchange threshold (HRR–GET model) would tighten the precision of HR-derived VO2 estimates during heavy exercise. Seven men and 7 women of various VO2 max levels, on 2 separate days, cycled for 6 min at intensities equal to power at GET, 15% the difference between GET and VO2 max (15% above), and at 30% above GET. A second bout at 15% above GET (15% above (bout 2)) after 3 min of recovery was performed to assess estimates during interval training. Actual VO2 was compared with estimates derived from the HRR–VO2R and the HRR–GET. VO2 values were summed over the 6 min duration of data collection (6 min LO2) and compared with Bland–Altman plots. HRR–VO2R yielded 6 min LO2 (±2 SD) overestimates of 2.0 (±2.5), 1.9 (±2.7), and 1.3 (±3.3) for GET, 15% over, and 30% over, respectively, whereas corresponding 6 min LO2 difference values for the HRR–GET model were –0.42 (±1.6), –0.23 (±1.1), and –0.55 (±1.8), respectively. For 15% above (bout 2), the 6 min LO2 difference for HRR–VO2R was 1.8 (±2.9), whereas the difference for HRR–GET was 0.17 (±1.4). The 6 min LO2 values relative to the subjects’ VO2 max did not vary (r = 0.05 to 0.36); therefore, fitness level did not affect estimates. Sex did not affect accuracy of either estimate model (sex X estimate model interaction, p > 0.95). We observed accurate estimates from the HRR–GET model during heavy exercise.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Physiology (medical),Nutrition and Dietetics,Physiology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3