Understanding root growth capacity: theoretical considerations in assessing planting stock quality by means of root growth tests

Abstract

Laboratory assays for measuring the root growth capacity (RGC) of forest tree seedlings were first developed in the belief that root extension immediately after planting is a major determinant of establishment success. An assumption underlying the development of these tests was that root growth under standardized conditions in the laboratory is indicative of root growth under the generally quite different and often highly variable conditions in the field. Evidence in support of this assumption is slight. Recently, it has been proposed that RGC affects seedling performance, not directly, but by virtue of a correlation with cold hardiness or other types of stress resistance that directly affect performance. For this hypothesis, also, the evidence is slight. There is a need for a clearer understanding of the relationship between RGC and seedling establishment to decide how best to measure and interpret RGC as a gauge of stock quality. This is illustrated by a discussion of the optimum conditions for measuring RGC and of the quantitative relationship between RGC and early performance of planted stock.