Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to self-paced and ramp-graded exercise testing protocols

Author:

Beltz Nicholas M.1,Amorim Fabiano T.2,Gibson Ann L.2,Janot Jeffrey M.1,Kravitz Len2,Mermier Christine M.2,Cole Nathan2,Moriarty Terence A.2,Nunez Tony P.3,Trigg Sam2,Dalleck Lance C.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.

2. Department of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

3. Department of Human Performance and Sport, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA.

4. Recreation, Exercise & Sports Science Department, Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, CO, USA.

Abstract

Recent examinations have shown lower maximal oxygen consumption during traditional ramp (RAMP) compared with self-paced (SPV) graded exercise testing (GXT) attributed to differences in cardiac output. The current study examined the differences in hemodynamic and metabolic responses between RAMP and SPV during treadmill exercise. Sixteen recreationally trained men (aged23.7 ± 3.0 years) completed 2 separate treadmill GXT protocols. SPV consisted of five 2-min stages (10 min total) of increasing speed clamped by the Borg RPE6-20 scale. RAMP increased speed by 0.16 km/h every 15 s until volitional exhaustion. All testing was performed at 3% incline. Oxygen consumption was measured via indirect calorimetry; hemodynamic function was measured via thoracic impedance and blood lactate (BLa) was measured via portable lactate analyzer. Differences between SPV and RAMP protocols were analyzed as group means by using paired-samples t tests (R Core Team 2017). Maximal values for SPV and RAMP were similar (p > 0.05) for oxygen uptake (47.1 ± 3.4 vs. 47.4 ± 3.4 mL·kg−1·min−1), heart rate (198 ± 5 vs. 200 ± 6 beats·min−1), ventilation (158.8 ± 20.7 vs. 159.3 ± 19.0 L·min−1), cardiac output (26.9 ± 5.5 vs. 27.9 ± 4.2 L·min−1), stroke volume (SV) (145.9 ± 29.2 vs. 149.8 ± 25.3 mL·beat−1), arteriovenous oxygen difference (18.5 ± 3.1 vs. 19.7 ± 3.1 mL·dL−1), ventilatory threshold (VT) (78.2 ± 7.2 vs. 79.0% ± 7.6%), and peak BLa (11.7 ± 2.3 vs. 11.5 ± 2.4 mmol·L−1), respectively. In conclusion, SPV elicits similar maximal hemodynamic responses in comparison to RAMP; however, SV kinetics exhibited unique characteristics based on protocol. These results support SPV as a feasible GXT protocol to identify useful fitness parameters (maximal oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake kinetics, and VT).

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Physiology (medical),Nutrition and Dietetics,Physiology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3