Affiliation:
1. Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, and Special Education (ECPS), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Abstract
A critical step in the development and use of tests of physical fitness for employment purposes (e.g., fitness for duty) is to establish 1 or more cut points, dividing the test score range into 2 or more ordered categories reflecting, for example, fail/pass decisions. Over the last 3 decades elaborated theories and methods have evolved focusing on the process of establishing 1 or more cut-scores on a test. This elaborated process is widely referred to as “standard-setting”. As such, the validity of the test score interpretation hinges on the standard-setting, which embodies the purpose and rules according to which the test results are interpreted. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of standard-setting methodology. The essential features, key definitions and concepts, and various novel methods of informing standard-setting will be described. The focus is on foundational issues with an eye toward informing best practices with new methodology. Throughout, a case is made that in terms of best practices, establishing a test standard involves, in good part, setting a cut-score and can be conceptualized as evidence/data-based policy making that is essentially tied to test validity and an evidential trail.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Physiology (medical),Nutrition and Dietetics,Physiology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference36 articles.
1. Raw-Score Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement in Generalizability Theory
2. Brennan, R.L. 2001. Generalizability theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.
3. Cizek, G.J. (Editor). 2012. Setting performance standards: foundations, methods, and innovations. Routledge, New York.
4. Cronbach, L.J. 1988. Five perspectives on validity argument. In Test Validity. Edited by H. Wainer and H. Braun. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., USA. pp. 3–17.
5. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献