Reliability-based design of internal limit states for mechanically stabilized earth walls using geosynthetic reinforcement

Author:

Bathurst Richard J.1,Lin Peiyuan2,Allen Tony3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, GeoEngineering Center at Queen’s–RMC, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

2. Department of Civil Engineering Ryerson Institute of Infrastructure Innovation, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada; formerly Department of Civil Engineering, GeoEngineering Center at Queen’s–RMC, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada.

3. Washington State Department of Transportation, State Materials Laboratory, P.O. Box 47365, Olympia, WA 98504-736, USA.

Abstract

This paper demonstrates reliability-based design for tensile rupture and pullout limit states for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls constructed with geosynthetic (geogrid) reinforcement. The general approach considers the accuracy of the load and resistance models that appear in each limit state equation plus uncertainty due to the confidence (level of understanding) of the designer at the time of design. The reliability index is computed using a closed-form solution that is easily implemented in a spreadsheet. The general approach provides a quantitative link between nominal factor of safety, which is familiar in allowable stress design practice, and reliability index used in modern civil engineering reliability-based design practice. A well-documented MSE wall case study is used to demonstrate the general approach and to compare margins of safety using different load and resistance model combinations. A practical outcome from the case study example is the observation that the pullout limit state is much less likely to control design than the ultimate tensile rupture state for walls with continuous reinforcement coverage. The more accurate “simplified stiffness method” that is used to compute tensile loads in the reinforcement under operational conditions is shown to generate a more cost-effective reinforcement option than the less accurate American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) simplified method.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unsaturated soil nailing wall system reliability analysis using random finite element;Computers and Geotechnics;2024-09

2. Internal Stability of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall Using Machine Learning Techniques;Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology;2024-05-13

3. A Bibliometric Review of Reinforced Soil Wall Research Topics;International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering;2024-05-07

4. Probabilistic analysis for the reinforced fill over void problem;Geosynthetics International;2023-10-10

5. LRFD calibration for soil failure limit state using the Stiffness Method;Canadian Geotechnical Journal;2023-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3