Towards consideration of epistemic uncertainty in shear-wave velocity measurements obtained via seismic cone penetration testing (SCPT)

Author:

Stolte Andrew C.1,Cox Brady R.11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Abstract

Seismic cone penetration testing (SCPT) is a powerful geotechnical site characterization tool, allowing for simultaneous collection of routine cone penetration testing data and rapid downhole-type measurements of shear-wave velocity (VS). However, the uncertainties associated with developing VS profiles from SCPT measurements are rarely considered or communicated to the end-user. One important source of VS uncertainty is related to how the shear wave travel times are interpreted from the recorded waveforms, while another critical source of uncertainty is related to the analysis method used to transform the travel times to velocities. In this study, four common ways of obtaining travel times were considered: (i) first arrival picks, (ii) peaks and troughs picks, (iii) crossover picks, and (iv) the peak response of the cross-correlation function. Using these different travel times, a number of VS profiles were developed using four different velocity analysis methods: (i) pseudo-interval, (ii) true-interval, (iii) corrected vertical travel time slope-based, and (iv) raytracing. Through consideration of multiple wave arrival time and velocity analysis methods, a robust and meaningful quantification of the intramethod, depth-dependent epistemic uncertainty in VS obtained from several example SCPT datasets has been developed. VS uncertainty is further examined through consideration of the intermethod variability and bias between SCPT and direct-push crosshole testing.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference31 articles.

1. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils from Shear-Wave Velocity

2. ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM standard D5778-12. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.

3. ASTMl. 2014. Standard test methods for crosshole seismic testing. ASTM standard D4428/D4428M-14. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.

4. ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for downhole seismic testing. ASTM standard D7400-17. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.

5. ASTM. 2017b. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM standard D2487. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cone penetration tests and dynamic soil properties;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2024-06-01

2. DAS for 2-D MASW imaging: a case study on the benefits of flexible subarray processing;Geophysical Journal International;2024-03-27

3. Practical use of shear wave velocity measurements in UK clays (BGA Touring Lecture 2023);Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering;2024-01-23

4. Determination of Constrained Modulus of Granular Soil from In Situ Tests—Part 1 Analyses;Geotechnics;2023-12-21

5. Quasi-site-specific prediction of shear wave velocity from CPTu;Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering;2023-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3