Experimental evaluation of accuracy of current practices in analysis and design of railway track sleepers

Author:

Sadeghi J. M.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran (email: ).

Abstract

This research investigates the accuracy of the assumptions made in the current method of analysis and design of railway track sleepers. This study consists of a comprehensive field investigation into the response of sleepers in a railway track system to static and dynamic loads. In the experiments, several load cells (load gauges) are installed under a rail seat and beneath a B70 concrete sleeper for the purpose of monitoring the response of the sleeper to vertical loads. The dynamic coefficients factor, the ratio of the rail seat load to the wheel load and the pressures between the sleeper and the ballast are measured. The results are used to evaluate the current approaches for the analysis and design of concrete sleepers, in particular those proposed by the Americans (AREMA) and Europeans (UIC). New models are proposed for the calculation of dynamic load factors, correlations between wheel loads and rail seat loads, and load distribution patterns beneath sleepers.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

General Environmental Science,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference17 articles.

1. AREMA. 2006. Manual for Railway Engineering. Vol. 1. American railway engineering and maintenance-of-way Association Publishing Service, Washington, D.C.

2. Clark, C.W. 1957. Track loading fundamentals. The Railway Gazette. Part 1, pp. 45–48, part 2, pp. 103–107.

3. Doyle, N. 1980. Railway track design, a review of current practice. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia. pp. 5–35.

4. Esveld, A. 2001. Modern railway track. MRT Productions, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.

5. Fredrick, C.O., and Newton, S.G. 1977. The relationship between traffic and track damage – The effect of vertical loads. Technical Note TN.T2. British Broad Research and Development Division, London.

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3