Fish habitat modeling: from conceptual framework to functional tools

Abstract

Natural and anthropogenic perturbations do not always equally affect all parts of an ecosystem, and all parts of an ecosystem do not equally contribute to maintain fish communities. The increasing pressure to use natural resources and to modify habitats led to the development of approaches to identify areas of key importance for fish communities. Following these approaches, aquatic systems could be perceived as puzzles, composed of a multitude of pieces with temporally flexible physical attributes and biological roles. Such a spatially explicit framework requires models that may allow one to predict fish distribution patterns and fish net energy gain once they have adopted a specific distribution pattern. Despite the conceptual appeal of spatially explicit approaches, functional tools may be obtained only after their assumptions have been tested and their models have been validated. Efforts must be deployed to identify temporal and spatial scales at which fish distribution and abundance should be estimated and modeled. Studies on fish behaviour and the energetic consequences of these behaviours must be conducted to insure that bioenergetic criteria used to define fish habitat quality do not depend on arbitrary assumptions about fish activity costs.