Testing hypotheses concerning the formation of shell growth marks in marine pelecypods

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence supporting the current hypotheses (daily, tidal, endogenous, and other rhythms of growth) accounting for short-term periodicity in the formation of marks (external growth ridges and internal growth increments) on the shell of marine pelecypod molluscs. With few exceptions our analysis shows too much unexplained variability and the availability of too few studies of potential sources of variation for the proposed cycles of mark formation (circadian, circatidal) to be accepted. Since shell deposition takes the form of marks, which must be discrete in frequency (0, 1, or 2 per given day or tidal period), we submit that individual frequencies must be used to test hypotheses concerning the rhythms of shell growth mark formation, and we propose the use of three criteria: (i) that departure of the individual measured frequency from the expected frequency should not be more than the maximal error in measurements (maximal counting errors made by the observer); (ii) should condition one be violated, then the so-called "missing" or "superfluous" marks should be clearly accounted for; (iii) that potential sources of variation (e.g., age, habitat, locality, season) should not significantly influence the frequency of formation of the marks.