A pan-Canadian assessment of empirical research on post-disturbance recovery in the Canadian Forest Service

Author:

Waldron Kaysandra1ORCID,Thiffault Nelson2ORCID,Venier Lisa3ORCID,Bognounou Fidèle1ORCID,Boucher Dominique1,Campbell Elizabeth4ORCID,Whitman Ellen5,Brehaut Lucas6ORCID,Gauthier Sylvie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laurentian Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 1055 du PEPS, P.O. Box 10380, Sainte-Foy Stn., Québec, QC G1V 4C7, Canada

2. Canadian Wood Fibre Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 1055 du PEPS, P.O. Box 10380, Sainte-Foy Stn., Québec, QC G1V 4C7, Canada

3. Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen St. E., Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 2E5, Canada

4. Pacific Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 506 Burnside Rd W, Victoria, BC V8Z 1M5, Canada

5. Northern Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 5320 122 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada

6. Atlantic Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, 26 University Drive, P.O. Box 960, Corner Brook, NL A2H 6J3, Canada

Abstract

Information about post-disturbance regeneration success and successional dynamics is critical to predict forest ecosystem resistance and resilience to disturbances and climate change. Our objective was to identify and classify post-disturbance empirical research conducted by the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) of Natural Resources Canada and their collaborators to provide guidance on future research needs, improving our understanding of post-disturbance recovery in a Canadian context. To achieve our objective, we collected and classified peer-reviewed and non-published literature produced by the CFS between 1998 and 2020 that concerned post-disturbance ecology. We focused on research addressing natural or anthropogenic disturbances, such as wildfires, pest outbreaks, windthrows, forest management, seismic lines, and those that studied processes related to soil, vegetation, fauna, hydrology, and microbial communities. We found that forest harvesting was the disturbance most studied by CFS between 1998 and 2020, followed by fire. Despite the fact that large, forested areas are affected annually by pests, studies on recovery after pest outbreaks were scarce. Other disturbances, such as mining and seismic lines or other abiotic disturbances were rare in CFS literature. Most studies (70%) examined changes in vegetation related to forest management and fire and they were mainly focussed on post-disturbance tree regeneration success. Post-disturbance changes in understory species diversity were also well-studied. Our results provide a geographic overview of CFS research on post-disturbance recovery in Canada and enable the identification of key knowledge gaps. Notably, research focusing on recovery after natural disturbances was underrepresented in the assessed literature compared to studies centered around harvesting. Long-term research sites, chronosequences that substitute space for time, and studies focused on consecutive disturbances are especially important to maintain and establish sustainable forest management strategies in the face of climate change.

Funder

Canadian Forest Service - Natural Resources Canada

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3