Characterizing site investigation performance in a two layer soil profile

Author:

Crisp M.P.1,Jaksa M.B.1,Kuo Y.L.1,Fenton G.A.2,Griffiths D.V.3

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005 Australia.

2. Department of Engineering Mathematics and Internetworking, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA.

Abstract

Insufficient or inappropriate soil testing can lead to a range of undesirable consequences, and yet there is no guideline for optimal investigation. This study analyses the influence of a two layer, virtual soil profile with an undulating boundary on site investigation performance. Factors investigated include the method of representing the boundary within the soil model, the stiffness ratio of the two layers, choice of test type, the pile length relative to the boundary length, and the number of boreholes and piles. The relative error contribution from the uncertainty sources of layer geology and soil variability is also examined. Investigation performance is assessed through Monte Carlo analysis in terms of total expected project cost, while implicitly incorporating the risk of damage from poor investigation. It has been shown that the optimal investigation can save in the order of AUD$1.5 million and that 2D soil models can represent 3D soils.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

General Environmental Science,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference30 articles.

1. Albatal, A. 2013. Effect of inadequate site investigation on the cost and time of a construction project. M.Sc. thesis, Construction and Building Engineering Department, Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport, Yemen.

2. Arsyad, A. 2009. The effect of limited site investigations on the design and performance of pile foundations. M.Sc. thesis, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A.

3. Baecher, G.B., and Christian, J.T. 2005. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.

4. Clayton, C. 2001. Managing geotechnical risk: time for change? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 149: 3–11. 10.1680/geng.2001.149.1.3.

5. Crisp, M.P., Jaksa, M.B., and Kuo, Y.L. 2017. The influence of site investigation scope on pile design in multi-layered, 2D variable ground. In Proceedings of Geo-Risk 2017: Impact of Spatial Variability, Probabilistic Site Characterization, and Geohazards, June 4–7, 2017, Denver, Colorado. 10.1061/9780784480717.037.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3