A comparison of the Bradford and Lowry methods for the analysis of protein in chlorophyllous tissue

Author:

Eze J. M. O.,Dumbroff E. B.

Abstract

A comparison of the dye-binding method of Bradford (1976) with the Folin phenol method of Lowry et al. (1951) for the assay of protein in chlorophyllous tissue is described. Additions of chlorophyll to protein standards precluded reliable determinations with either method. Absorbance readings were increased by nearly 20% with the Bradford assay and by over 400% using the Lowry procedure. Trichloroacetic acid precipitation of the proteins effectively eliminated any significant interference by chlorophyll; however, the practice of washing the protein precipitate with 80% acetone to remove residual chlorophyll resulted in large protein losses. Eluting leaf tissue with acetone prior to extraction of protein increased protein yield significantly. Both assay procedures provide satisfactory measurement of leaf proteins once chlorophyll is removed. The dye-binding method is fast, simple, and more sensitive, but the Lowry procedure gives better linearity at high protein concentrations and better stability once color has developed.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Plant Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3