Affiliation:
1. Institut de recherche sur les forêts (IRF) and Centre d’étude de la forêt, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 445, boul. de l’Université, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada.
2. Institut de recherche sur les forêts (IRF), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 445, boul. de l’Université, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada.
Abstract
Mixed-species stands present a number of opportunities for and challenges to forest managers. Boreal mixedwood stands in eastern Canada are often characterized by a dominant canopy of shade-intolerant aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) with more shade-tolerant conifers in the mid- to sub-canopy layers. Because the aspen and conifer components often attain optimal merchantable sizes at different moments in stand development, there is an interest in developing silvicultural practices that allow partial or total removal of aspen and favour accelerated growth of residual conifers. We tested four partial harvesting treatments in mixed aspen – white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss) stands in which different proportions of aspen (0%, 50%, 65%, and 100% basal area) were removed. Ten years after treatments, 72 spruce stems representing dominant, co-dominant, and suppressed social classes were destructively sampled for stem analysis. Using linear mixed effect models, we analyzed growth as a function of treatment intensity, time since treatment, social status, pretreatment growth rate, and neighbourhood competition. Relative to control stands, radial and volume growth responses were detected only in the extreme treatment of 100% aspen removal. In relative terms, suppressed trees showed the greatest magnitude of cumulative growth increase. Compared with control trees, average annual radial and volume increments were, respectively, 23.5% and 7.1% higher for dominant trees, 67.7% and 24.1% higher for co-dominant trees, and 115.8% and 65.6% higher for suppressed trees over the 10 years after treatment. Growth response was proportional to pretreatment growth rate, and among neighbouring trees, only coniferous neighbours had a negative effect on white spruce growth. Our results suggest that in similar mixed-stand conditions, relatively heavy removal of overstory aspen accompanied by thinning of crowded conifers would result in greatest growth response of residual spruce stems.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change
Reference52 articles.
1. Assmann, E. 1970. The principles of forest yield study: studies in the organic production, structure, increment and yield of forest stands. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, UK.
2. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management
3. Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation
4. Bauhus, J., Puettmann, K.J., and Kühne, C. 2013. Close-to-nature forest management in Europe: does it support complexity and adaptability of forest ecosystems? In Managing forests as complex adaptive systems: building resilience to the challenge of global change. Edited by C. Messier, K.J. Puettmann, and K.D. Coates. Routledge, New York. pp. 187–213.
5. Managing understory light conditions in boreal mixedwoods through variation in the intensity and spatial pattern of harvest: A modelling approach
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献