Earth pressures on twin positive projecting and induced trench box culverts under high embankments

Author:

McGuigan Benjamin L.1,Valsangkar Arun J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada.

Abstract

Although twin culverts are often preferred for watercourse crossing, little is known about the earth pressures they experience under high embankments. Centrifuge test results have been used in this research to verify a numerical model used to evaluate culvert spacing and compressible zone geometry for twin positive projecting and induced trench box culverts. Lower pressures were calculated for twin positive projecting culverts than for a single culvert. For the induced trench case, one compressible zone spanning both culverts was the preferred geometry for culverts spaced at 0.5Bcand 1.0Bc(where Bcis the culvert width), while two zones 1.2Bcwide were found to be optimal for 1.5Bcspacing. The twin configurations generally resulted in slightly higher vertical and lower lateral earth pressures than a single culvert configuration. The base contact pressures were 25%–76% greater than the top pressure plus dead load because of shear stresses mobilized along the sidewalls; however, they were 41%–47% lower than the pressures for positive projecting configurations. The maximum bending moments calculated for the induced trench culverts were 54%–59% lower than for the positive projecting ones. Induced trench construction therefore appears to be viable for twin box culverts, provided that frictional forces along the sidewalls are taken into account.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference21 articles.

1. AASHTO. 2007. AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications. 4th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.

2. ACPA. 1980. Concrete pipe design manual. American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, Va.

3. ACPA. 1998. Concrete pipe handbook. American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, Va.

4. ACPA. 2000. Concrete pipe design manual. American Concrete Pipe Association, Vienna, Va.

5. ASTM. 2004. Standard specification for precast reinforced concrete box sections for culverts, storm drains, and sewers (metric). ASTM standard C1433M-04. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa.

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3