Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: an introduction1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

Author:

Warburton Darren E.R.12,Jamnik Veronica K.3,Bredin Shannon S.D.4,McKenzie Don C.5,Stone James6,Shephard Roy J.7,Gledhill Norman3

Affiliation:

1. Unit II Osborne Centre, Cardiovascular Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 6108 Thunderbird Blvd, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.

2. Experimental Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.

3. Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.

4. Cognitive and Functional Learning Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.

5. School of Kinesiology and Division of Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.

6. Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Cardiac Wellness Institute of Calgary, Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, AB T2N 2T8, Canada.

7. Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.

Abstract

The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) and the Physical Activity Readiness Medical Evaluation (PARmed-X) are internationally renowned and extensively used preparticipation screening tools. However, recent feedback from end-users has identified limitations to the existing PAR-Q and PARmed-X screening process. As such, a systematic evaluation of the PAR-Q and PARmed-X forms was conducted, adhering to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria. Recognized experts in physical activity (PA) and prominent health conditions worked with an expert consensus panel to increase the effectiveness of the PAR-Q and PARmed-X PA participation clearance process. The systematic review process established that the health benefits of PA participation far outweigh the risks in the vast majority of asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. A new risk continuum and decision tree process was created to allow for the effective risk stratification of prominent health conditions, reducing greatly the barriers to PA participation for the majority of individuals. The new PA participation clearance process is available in new paper and online versions (PAR-Q+) and the PARmed-X was replaced with an online interactive computer programme (ePARmed-X+). It is anticipated that this new risk stratification and PA clearance process will reduce markedly the barriers for PA participation for both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Physiology (medical),Nutrition and Dietetics,Physiology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3