Drawing the lines: resolving fishery management units with simple fisheries data

Author:

Cope Jason M.12,Punt André E.12

Affiliation:

1. Fishery Resource Analysis and Monitoring Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, WA 98112-2097, USA.

2. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195-5020, USA.

Abstract

The task of assessing marine resources should begin with defining management units. Often this step is overlooked or defined at temporal scales irrelevant to management needs. Additionally, traditional methods to define stock structure can be data intensive and (or) cost prohibitive and thus not available for emerging or data-limited fisheries. We present an approach that uses commonly available fisheries data (catch and effort) to delineate management units for dynamically independent populations. Spatially explicit standardized indices of abundance are grouped using a two-step partitioning cluster analysis that includes abundance index uncertainty. This “management unit estimator” is tested via simulation and found generally to recover the true number of management units across data of different temporal length, sample size, and quality. Management units are then determined for four species with varying ecologies, fishery histories, and data issues that exemplify the challenges of applying this method to messy data sets. Defining management units via relative abundance incorporates changes in population connectivity in relation to current removals and environmental conditions and creates consistency of index use within assessments. The two-step clustering approach is simple and widely applicable to situations wherein the clustering metric contains uncertainty.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference80 articles.

1. Acuna, E., and Kotwicki, S. 2006. 2004 Bottom trawl survey of the eastern Bering Sea continental shelf. Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, Wash. AFSC Processed Rep. 2006-09.

2. An holistic approach to fish stock identification

3. Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview

4. The role of life history parameters as indicators of stock structure

5. Berkhin, P. 2006. A survey of clustering data mining techniques. In Grouping multidimensional data: recent advances in clustering. Edited by J. Kogan, C. Nicholas, and M. Teboulle. Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp. 25–71.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3