Antagonist actions of bicuculline methiodide and picrotoxin on extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid receptors

Abstract

The effects of picrotoxin and bicuculline methiodide to block depolarizing responses of extrasynaptic receptors for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are compared using excitability testing of myelinated axons in amphibian peripheral nerve. The actions of the antagonists appear both complex and dissimilar. Picrotoxin (10–1000 μM) produces large reversible depressions of the maximal response to GABA (0.01–10 mM) and increases the EC50 from 0.33 to 12.6 mM. With high concentrations of agonist and antagonist an insensitive component is apparent. The action of picrotoxin is not classically noncompetitive: it may represent a mixed antagonism (competitive and noncompetitive) or a noncompetitive one, masked by the presence of receptor reserve and (or) secondary depolarizing influences (e.g., GABA-evoked [K+]o accumulation). Bicuculline methiodide (10–200 μM) shifts the GABA concentration–response curve to the right; maximal responses persist and are even enhanced. The impression that bicuculline methiodide has a competitive action is supported by analysis of its inhibition of responses to low concentrations of the agonist. It is suggested that the enhancement of GABA responses by bicuculline methiodide and their apparent resistance to block by picrotoxin may be due to a common secondary effect of the antagonists such as a decrease in membrane conductance to K+ and (or) block of transmitter uptake.