Author:
Gillis Darren M.,Peterman Randall M.,Tyler Albert V.
Abstract
Many traditional analyses of fisheries data assume that there is a negligible effect of alternative fish stocks on the spatial distribution of fishing effort and that the amount of local effort does not influence catchability. There is growing evidence that contradicts these assumptions. Because of the potential biases that these erroneous assumptions may cause in the interpretation of catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) statistics, it is important to determine the factors governing the spatial distribution of effort in a fishery. We used data on the Hecate Strait, British Columbia, Canada, trawl fishery to test hypotheses about spatial allocation of effort and interaction among fishing vessels. The ideal free distribution of Fretwell and Lucas (1970. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16–36) was the foundation for deriving these tests. We found evidence for competition among vessels, although we could not distinguish whether the mechanism was interference or exploitation competition. As well, CPUE was generally equalized among the areas fished, as predicted by the ideal free distribution, because of movement of boats among areas. Thus, area-specific CPUE would not be a reliable index of relative abundance of fish in different areas; relative fishing effort may be better.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
139 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献