Communicating science: Sending the right message to the right audience

Author:

Wilson Matthew J.1,Ramey Tonya L.2,Donaldson Michael R.3,Germain Ryan R.4,Perkin Elizabeth K.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Entomology, Stroud Water Research Center, Avondale, PA 19311, USA

2. Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

3. Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada

4. Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland AB24 2TZ, UK

5. Department of Biology, Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA

Abstract

For science communication to be effective, scientists must understand which sources of information their target audiences most frequently use and trust. We surveyed academic and non-academic scientists, natural resource managers, policymakers, students, and the general public about how they access, trust, and communicate scientific information. We found trust and use of information sources was related to participant age and group identity, but all groups had high levels of use and trust of personal experience and colleagues. Academic journals were the most trusted source by all groups, and social media the least trusted by most groups. The level of communication between target groups was not always bilateral, with the public generally perceiving their interaction with all other groups as low. These results provide remarkable insight into the flow of scientific information. We present these findings in the context of facilitating information flow between scientists and other stakeholders of scientific information.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference27 articles.

1. Science communication for biodiversity conservation

2. Ten Simple Rules for Effective Online Outreach

3. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact

4. Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference

5. Burnham K, and Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York, New York, USA. 488 pp.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3