Abstract
The construction of diameter-distribution models sometimes calls for the simultaneous prediction of population parameters from hierarchical data. Appropriate data for such models have characteristics that should be preserved or accommodated: clustering and contemporaneous correlations. Fitting techniques for such data must allow for these characteristics. Using a case study, I compare two techniques seemingly-unrelated regression (SUR) and principal components analysis (PCA) whilst using mixed-effects models. I adapt and apply a metric that focuses on volume prediction, which is a key application for diameter distributions. The results suggest that using mixed-effects models provides useful insights into environmental variation, and that SUR is more convenient and produces a slightly better fit than PCA. Both techniques are acceptable with regard to regression assumptions.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献