Author:
Jeune Bernard,Sattler Rolf
Abstract
The authors discuss presuppositions of classical plant morphology and point out the difficulties of classical (classificatory) typology (based on typical forms that are mutually exclusive, categories such as shoot, root, leaf, or trichome), which have been known for a long time. It is shown how these difficulties can be overcome by a more open morphology concept that is continuous and dynamic. Furthermore, it is pointed out that such an approach works through an appropriate methodology based on principal components analysis and a decomposition of the plant into nested morphological articulations. Keywords: plant morphology, continuum morphology, dynamic morphology.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The floral morphospace – a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution;New Phytologist;2014-08-18
2. Classical and dynamic morphology: toward a synthesis through the space of forms;Acta Biotheoretica;2007-05-08
3. Encasement in plant morphology: an integrative approach from genes to organisms;Canadian Journal of Botany;2005-10
4. Developmental Genetics and Morphological Evolution of Flowering Plants, Especially Bladderworts (Utricularia): Fuzzy Arberian Morphology Complements Classical Morphology, , , , , , , , , ;Annals of Botany;2001-12
5. The Fundamental Relevance of Morphology and Morphogenesis to Plant Research;Annals of Botany;1997-11