Characterization of ion movements and their relationship to muscarinic receptor binding and excitation–contraction coupling in guinea pig ileal longitudinal smooth muscle

Abstract

The relationship between ion movements (sodium uptake and potassium release) and agonist-induced contractile responses or muscarinic receptor binding was investigated in the guinea pig ileal longitudinal muscle (GPLM). Sodium uptake and potassium release were agonist-dependent, concentration-dependent, and stereoselective, with the following rank order of maximum ion movement: muscarinic agonists > histamine > substance P = serotonin. Potassium depolarization did not initiate sodium uptake or potassium release. Sodium uptake was rapid and monophasic, preceding potassium release which was biphasic in nature. Full muscarinic agonists produced equal maximal increases in sodium uptake, while maximal potassium release varied for all muscarinic agonists and in addition differed from sodium uptake in the following ways: time course, stereoselectivity, sensitivity to calcium antagonists, modulation by the guanylyl nucleotide derivative, 5′-guanylylimidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p), and inhibition by muscarinic receptor blockade with benzilylcholine mustard. The calcium ionophores A23187 and ionomycin (SQ23377) did not produce any sodium uptake; A23187 but not ionomycin produced potassium release comparable to that evoked by muscarinic agonists. Ion movement in response to combinations of agonists were not additive. Muscarinic agonist binding as measured by competition for [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB) binding, was best described by multiple sites and was regulated by Gpp(NH)p. Excellent correlations were observed between the dissociation constants for binding and sodium uptake, potassium release, and contraction. The best correlations were those between the pharmacologic responses and the high affinity binding site in the absence, and the low affinity site in the presence, of Gpp(NH)p, respectively. Furthermore, the potencies of muscarinic agonists to evoke ion movements and to inhibit [3H]QNB binding were similar, and from one to two orders of magnitude less than those for contraction. It is suggested that contraction and potassium release were mediated by the high affinity, and sodium uptake by the low and average affinity muscarinic agonist binding sites, respectively. These findings suggest an agonist-activated receptor–effector coupling model in GPLM that leads to the activation of sodium uptake, potassium release, and subsequently, contraction.Key words: smooth muscle, contraction, muscarinic receptors, ion movements, excitation–contraction coupling.