Soil bacteria: comparisons of rhizosphere and nonrhizosphere populations

Author:

Skyring G. W.,Quadling C.

Abstract

Four sets, each of 100 bacterial isolates, were derived from two different flax rhizosphere and corresponding control (nonrhizosphere soil) samples. A two-stage principal component analysis was used to compare the nature and properties of these bacterial cultures which were selected by a random sampling method from primary isolation plates. These 400 experimental isolates were characterized by their reaction to a set of 98 tests. Principal component analysis was applied separately to the data for each of the four sets of cultures. The sets were then compared both in terms of the leading discriminating tests and of the detailed properties of the clusters of isolates detected. Because these isolates and a set of 100 named cultures (previously studied) were subjected to the same tests, the properties of groups of isolates from different sets could be directly compared. The kinds of isolates predominant in the rhizosphere samples were not represented amongst isolates derived from the corresponding control soil populations. The specific kinds of amino-acid-requiring isolates present in the control soil populations were not found in the corresponding rhizosphere populations. The two control soil sets of isolates (predominantly arthrobacter–coryneform-like organisms) were generally similar in their reactions to the tests used, but the two sets of rhizosphere isolates (predominantly pseudomonas-like organisms) were relatively dissimilar. The named species studied previously were not sufficiently indicative of the diversity found in the experimental isolates: this was especially true of the arthrobacter-like isolates. The numerical analyses yielded useful groupings of tests and of cultures and aided in their evaluation.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Genetics,Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,General Medicine,Immunology,Microbiology

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3