Abstract
Bacterial classifications based on morphology soon led to chaos, and a semblance of order was restored by using physiological characters. With the accumulation of knowledge chaos is raising its head again. Good classification depends on accurate characterization; standardized methods can help to make descriptions comparable and of more uniform value. Many descriptions need amplification and this could be provided by the expert sub-committees of the International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature. Classification must precede the naming of the bacteria, and much remains to be done in the realm of nomenclature. The year 1753 was fixed as the starting date; thus many names without adequate descriptions are in use today. It appears that Serratia marcescens was originally applied to a yeast and is thus not available as the name of a bacterium.Steps that might be taken to reduce nomenclatural chaos include the conservation of certain specific epithets and the selection of type strains; withholding recognition of species for which a type culture is not available; the registration of new names; and publication of newly described species in a limited number of recognized and official journals.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Genetics,Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,General Medicine,Immunology,Microbiology
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Serratia Infections: from Military Experiments to Current Practice;Clinical Microbiology Reviews;2011-10
2. Seeing red: The story of prodigiosin;Advances in Applied Microbiology;2000
3. The Founding of Numerical Taxonomy;The British Journal for the History of Science;1988-06
4. The Genus Serratia;Annual Review of Microbiology;1978-10
5. Heretical Taxonomy for Bacteriologists;Journal of General Microbiology;1970-05-01