Affiliation:
1. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Wellington, New Zealand.
Abstract
The conclusions drawn from fisheries stock assessment models can depend strongly on the relative weights assigned to different data sets. However, there is no consensus amongst practitioners as to the best approach to data weighting. From a discussion of some key questions concerning data weighting in stock assessment models, I draw three guiding principles: (i) do not let other data stop the model from fitting abundance data well; (ii) when weighting age or length composition data, allow for correlations; and (iii) do not down-weight abundance data because they may be unrepresentative. I propose an approach to data weighting based on these principles. Two factors that complicate this approach are that some decisions are inevitably subjective (which underlines the need for expert knowledge in stock assessment), and some technical problems are unresolved.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference48 articles.
1. ADMB Foundation. 2011. AD Model Builder version 10.1. ADMB Foundation, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hawaii. Available from admb-project.org/ [accessed 16 May 2011].
2. A new look at the statistical model identification
3. A length-based Bayesian stock assessment model for the New Zealand abalone Haliotis iris
4. Clark, W.G., and Hare, S.R. 2006. Assessment and management of Pacific halibut: data, methods, and policy. Scientific Report 83. International Pacific Halibut Commission, Seattle, Wash.
Cited by
193 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献