Applicability of a Salient Belief Elicitation to Measure Abortion Beliefs

Author:

Maier Julie M.1,Jozkowski Kristen N.2,Valdez Danny3,Crawford Brandon L.4,Turner Ronna C.5,Lo Wen-Juo6

Affiliation:

1. Julie M. Maier, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States

2. Kristen N. Jozkowski, William L. Yarber Endowed Professor in Sexual Health, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States;, Email: knjozkow@iu.edu

3. Danny Valdez, Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States

4. Brandon L. Crawford, Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States

5. Ronna C. Turner, Professor, Educational Statistics and Research Methods, College of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States

6. Wen-Juo Lo, Associate Professor, Educational Statistics and Research Methods, College of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States

Abstract

Objectives: Salient belief elicitations (SBEs), informed by the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA), are used to identify 3 sets of beliefs – behavioral, control, and normative – that influence attitudes toward a health behavior. SBEs ask participants about their own beliefs through open-ended questions. We adapted a SBE by focusing on abortion, which is infrequently examined through SBEs; we also included a survey version that asked participants their views on what a hypothetical woman would do if contemplating an abortion. Given these deviations from traditional SBEs, the purpose of this study was to assess if the adapted SBE was understood by participants in English and Spanish through cognitive interviewing. Methods: We examined participants' interpretations of SBE items about abortion to determine if they aligned with the corresponding RAA construct. We administered SBE surveys and conducted cognitive interviews with US adults in both English and Spanish. Results: Participants comprehended the SBE questions as intended. Participants' interpretations of most questions were also in line with the respective RAA construct. Conclusions: SBE survey questions were comprehended well by participants. We discuss areas in which SBE questions can be modified to improve alignment with the underlying RAA construct to assess abortion beliefs.

Publisher

JCFCorp SG PTE LTD

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3