Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions

Author:

Connors Shahnjayla K.1,Leal Isabel Martinez2,Nitturi Vijay3,Iwundu Chisom N.4,Maza Valentina5,Reyes Stacey6,Acquati Chiara7,Reitzel Lorraine R.8

Affiliation:

1. Shahnjayla K. Connors, Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, United States

2. Isabel Martinez Leal, Research Associate II, Social and Behavioral Science, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States;, Email: imarti31@central.uh.edu

3. Vijay Nitturi, Research Assistant, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States

4. Chisom N. Iwundu, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological Health and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States

5. Valentina Maza, Research Assistant, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University, Houston, Houston, TX, United States

6. Stacey Reyes, Research Assistant, Department of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, United States

7. Chiara Acquati, Assistant Professor, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States

8. Lorraine R. Reitzel, Professor, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States

Abstract

Objectives: Breast reconstruction (BR) potentially can improve quality of life in postmastectomy breast cancer survivors (BCS); however, African-American women are less likely to undergo BR than Caucasian women. This qualitative study was undertaken to explore individual, sociocultural, and contextual factors influencing African-American women's BR decision-making processes and preferences. Methods: Postmastectomy African-American BCS with and without BR participated in semi-structured interviews. We adopted a grounded theory approach using the constant comparison method to understand the contexts and processes informing participants' BR decision-making. Results: Twenty-three women participated, of whom 17 elected BR and 6 did not. Whereas women's primary reasons for deciding for or against BR differed, our core category, "empowered choices ," describes both groups' decision-making as a process focused on empowering themselves physically and/or psychologically, through self-advocacy, informed and shared decision-making, and giving back/receiving communal and spiritual support from church and African-American survivor groups. Socioeconomic factors influenced women's access to BR. Women preferred autologous BR and expressed the need for greater culturally-matched resources and support to inform treatment and shared BR decision-making. Conclusions: Understanding and supporting African-American women's BR preferences and empowerment is essential to ensuring equal access, and culturally-relevant, high-quality, and informed patient-centered care.

Publisher

JCFCorp SG PTE LTD

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology,Health(social science)

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3