Affiliation:
1. Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information
Abstract
The geopolitical, economic, environmental and social instability that has increased in recent years in the world requires the development and implementation of an effective sustainable development policy that provides for the adoption of balanced decisions from the standpoint of a fair assessment of the contribution of all three of its components (economic, social and environmental) to the overall result of economic activity and social progress. To assess the policy effectiveness on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) implementation, its achievements and gaps, the positions of Ukraine in international indexes of sustainable / green development were used: New Transitions Performance Index, Green Future Index, Index SDG, Green Growth Index, Global Sustainability Competitiveness Index. The use of several indexes contributes to a more comprehensive and objective analysis. Such an assessment will help to make informed management decisions, taking into account the impact of possible crisis situations. Based on the results of Ukraine’s positions analysis in international indexes, it was determined that, despite a significant number of state strategic documents and a large volume of tasks, not all of the 17 SDGs tasks have clear quantitative performance indicators, and the responsibility for their implementation is blurred. This analysis made it possible to identify factors of slow movement towards sustainable development, indicators of such stagnation. Such indicators cover almost all points of resource efficiency: a low share of renewable energy sources and a high share of extractive sources, high water, waste and resource intensity of GDP; the green economic incentives: lack of incentives and finances for the expansion of trade in ecological goods and services, for eco-innovations, extremely low volumes for R&D funding – the source of innovations and technologies; indices of effective management: perception of corruption index, volume of investments in % of GDP, quality of public services; intellectual capital index: quantity of received intellectual property rights per capita, etc. It is proposed to determine the movement activators towards sustainable development during the formation of the science, technology and innovation (STI) road map to achieve the SDGs, which is being developed at Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information within the framework of the relevant UN Global pilot program.
Publisher
State Scientific Institution - Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Info
Reference38 articles.
1. Kyrychenko, К. І.(2017). Mizhnarodni reitynhy y indeksy v systemi otsiniuvannia rivnia sotsialnykh, ekonomichnykh i politychnykh transformatsii v Ukraini [International rankings and indexes in the system for evaluation of the level of social, economic and political transformations in Ukraine].Upravlinnia rozvytkom – Development Management. 1–2, 18–26. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Uproz_2017_1-2_5 [in Ukr.].
2. Ryabchenko,V. I. (2021). Svitohliadna kompetentnist yak chynnyk zabezpechennia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti za stalyi rozvytok suchasnoho suspilstva [Worldview competence as a factor of ensuring social responsibility for sustainable development of the modern society]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Filosofski nauky – Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences. 1 (89), 88–101. Retrieved from:http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vzduffn_2021_1_10) [in Ukr.].
3. Tsili Staloho Rozvytku. Ukraina. 2021: monitorynhovyi zvit [Sustainable Development Goals. Ukraine. 2021. Monitoring Report]. Retrieved from: SDGs Ukraine 2021 Monitoring Report ukr.pdf (ukrstat.gov.ua) [in Ukr.].
4. Strezov, V., Evans, A. & Evans, T. J. (2017). Assessment of the Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions of the Indicators for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development. 25 (3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1649
5. Venghaus, S. & Dieken, S. From (2019). A few security indices to the FEW Security Index: Consistency in global food, energy and water security assessment. Sustainable Production And Consumption. 20, 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.08.002