Ticari buzağı mamalarının mikrobiyolojik analizi ve izole edilen Enterococcus türlerinde antibiyotik dirençliliği
Author:
USLU Ali1ORCID, ATALAY Mevlüt2ORCID, DENİZLİ Oguzhan3ORCID, SAKMANOĞLU Aslı3ORCID, SAYIN Zafer3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF VETERINARY, DEPARTMENT OF DISEASES AND CLINICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 2. Konya Food Control Laboratory 3. SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF PRE-CLINICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY
Abstract
One of the reasons why calf milk replacer is preferred over unpasteurized bulk tank milk or waste milk with antibiotics on farms is that it prevents epidemic diseases and antibiotic resistance that may occur on the farm. In this study analyzed commercial calf milk replacer products (n = 12) obtained from dairy farms around Turkiye by microbiological culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In order to evaluate the microbiological quality of calf milk replacer, total bacteria count, coliform E. coli and E. coli O157-H7, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp. analyses were performed according to microbiological analysis methods determined according to ISO standards. Enterococcus spp. was isolated from all 12 calf milk replacer samples analyzed and molecularly confirmed by PCR with the presence of the gross-Es gene. Salmonella spp., E. coli, Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. were not isolated from the samples.
Additionally, in the bacterial counts, an average of 5.3x107 Enterococci were counted from all samples in 1 gram of calf milk replacer. Antimicrobial analysis of the isolated bacteria was completed according to CLSI 2022 data, and 11 isolates were defined as multi drug resistance and one isolate was defined as extensive drug resistance. It was also determined that the isolate defined as extensive drug resistance was resistant to Vancomycin and carried the Van A resistance gene. Many proteins used in the preparation of calf milk replacers are of animal origin and may contain pathogenic bacteria. Milk replacers are used on most farms for biosecurity purposes. It is known that milk replacers affect microbiota. It was shown in this study that if calf milk replacers are not prepared under the regulations, they may cause harm rather than benefit to on-farm biosecurity factors. It is concerning that calves are given calf milk replacers containing antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus spp. to sustain their lives when they are most vulnerable to disease during the window of susceptibility. When using calf milk replacer in calf feeding, field veterinarians should be informed about the microbiological certification of the product and provide information about pasteurization and presentation for consumption.
Funder
Çalışmayı desteklenen bir proje ile tamamlanmamıştır.
Publisher
Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Amin, N., & Seifert, J. (2021). Dynamic progression of the calf’s microbiome and its influence on host health. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 19, 989-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.035 2. Aun, E., Kisand, V., Laht, M., Telling, K., Kalmus, P., Väli, Ü., & Tenson, T. (2021). Molecular characterization of Enterococcus isolates from different sources in Estonia reveals potential transmission of resistance genes among different reservoirs. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 601490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.601490 3. Aust, V., Knappstein, K., Kunz, H. J., Kaspar, H., Wallmann, J., & Kaske, M. (2013). Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 97(6), 1091-1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12019 4. Badman, J., Daly, K., Kelly, J., Moran, A. W., Cameron, J., Watson, I., & Shirazi-Beechey, S. P. (2019). The effect of milk replacer composition on the intestinal microbiota of pre-ruminant dairy calves. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00371 5. Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., & Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45(4_ts), 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/45.4_ts.493
|
|