Comparison of Results Based on the Number of Kirschner Wires of Different Diameters in Antegrade Intramedullary Fixation of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fractures

Author:

Lee Dong ChulORCID,Park Jung HyunORCID,Koh Sung HoonORCID,Kim Jin SooORCID,Lee Kyung JinORCID,Roh Si YoungORCID

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of patients with fifth metacarpal neck fractures using different sizes and numbers of Kirschner wires (K-wire).Methods: A single institutional retrospective review identified 67 patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture between January 2015 and July 2020. The minimum follow-up time was 6 months and they were all treated within 6.4 days of the initial injury. Either one K-wire (1.6 mm), two K-wires (1.1 mm), or three K-wires (0.9 mm) was used. We analyzed the bone union period, and K-wire removal period, duration of surgery, total active motion, intramedullary diameter, pre/postoperative shortening, and pre/postoperative angulation clinically. We used a Method of Shortening Stipulated to measure shortening and the Medullary Canal-lateral view method for angulation. The intramedullary diameter was measured in the mid-shaft of the fifth metacarpal bone in the coronal view. Total active motion was measured at the time of follow-up in our outpatient department.Results: Clinical and radiological parameters showed no statistically significant differences. Even though it did not present a statistical significance, the absolute mean duration of surgery was the shortest in a single K-wire group. Conclusion: The clinical and radiological outcomes of surgery were comparable regardless of the number of K-wires inserted. However, we could look forward to gaining potential benefit from shortened operation time in a single K-wire group. Since stable fixation can be obtained even if one K-wire is used, inserting one thick K-wire into the intramedullary canal can be an alternative according to the surgeon’s preference.

Publisher

Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3