Accident Safety Comparison of Elements to Define Low-Activation Materials-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Accident Safety Comparison of Elements to Define Low-Activation Materials

Published:1990-07 Issue:4 Volume:17 Page:636-657
ISSN:0748-1896
Container-title:Fusion Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:Fusion Technology

Author:

Piet Steven J.¹,Cheng Edward T.²,Porter Lisa J.³

Affiliation:

1. EG&G Idaho, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Fusion Safety Program, P.O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415

2. General Atomics, P.O. Box 85608 San Diego, California 92138

3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Engineering

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.13182/FST17-4-636

Reference16 articles.

1. R. W. CONN et al. “Panel Report on Low Activation Materials — Report to DOE,” PPG-753, Center for Plasma Physics and Fusion Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles (Mar. 1983).

2. Lower Activation Materials and Magnetic Fusion Reactors

3. Fusion Safety and Environmental Performance Goals

4. S. J. PIET et al. “Accident Safety Comparison of Elements to Define Low Activation Materials,” EGG-FSP-8552, EG&G Idaho (July 1989).

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Influence of 2 (wt%) titanium addition on the oxidation resistance of tungsten;Nuclear Materials and Energy;2022-06

2. Phase stability of V- based multi-principal element alloys;Materials Science and Technology;2022-05-19

3. High-Entropy Alloys for Advanced Nuclear Applications;Entropy;2021-01-11

4. Materials for future nuclear energy systems;Journal of Nuclear Materials;2019-12

5. Neutronics and activation analysis of lithium-based ternary alloys in IFE blankets;Fusion Engineering and Design;2016-06