A Comparative Study Between Artificial Intelligence Models and a Statistical Learning Model to Predict Gas Adsorption in Shales

Author:

Aly Moustafa1,Abdulraheem Abdulazeez2,Moawad Taha3

Affiliation:

1. University of Wyoming, USA

2. King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, KSA

3. King Saud University, KSA

Abstract

AbstractAs a cleaner energy source, the importance of shale gas as a fuel has increased in the past few decades with the main challenge faced being its quantification. While many accurate models exist for the estimation of the free gas inside the pore space of shales, only a limited number of empirical models with insufficient accuracy exist that can quantify the adsorbed gas. Also, adsorption experiments are complicated, time consuming, and prone to many sources of error including gas leakage during coring and preparation of samples. An attempt was made to develop a computational model to predict shale gas adsorption using statistical learning with a large data set consisting of 301 entries. The work done in this study attempted to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models that outperform the existing statistical learning model using the same data set. Three AI techniques were utilized in this study namely artificial neural networks (ANN), adaptive network-based fuzzy logic (ANFIS), and functional networks (FN). Using each AI technique, a submodel was developed for the prediction of both the Langmuir pressure and volume. The Langmuir pressure submodel used temperature (T), total organic carbon (TOC), and vitrinite reflectance (Ro) as input variables while only T and TOC were used as input for the volume submodel. Results showed that a model developed using ANFIS for the prediction of Langmuir pressure had an average absolute percentage error of only 15.26% compared to 27.67% of the statistical learning model. As for the volume submodel, ANN produced the best results with an AAPE of 21.34% compared to the original 23.76%. While FN showed better results in pressure prediction compared to statistical learning, the opposite was true for volume prediction. Also, in both prediction models (pressure and volume), FN was the least accurate our of the three AI methods.

Publisher

SPE

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3