Recognizing the Most Accurate Herschel-Bulkley Fluid Pressure Estimation Method for Annulus: An Update to API RP 13D, 7th Edition

Author:

Ashena Rahman1

Affiliation:

1. Independent Consultant, Houston (Corresponding author)

Abstract

Summary The Herschel-Bulkley (HB) model is widely regarded as highly accurate for modeling non-Newtonian fluid flow, applicable across diverse fields such as chemical, mechanical, and petroleum engineering. The American Petroleum Institute and other references recognize the HB model as the most accurate and recommend the industry use it for drilling hydraulics. Pressure estimation models are beneficial for applying the HB model in field settings, as numerical solutions may not be feasible due to the computational demands and time constraints, especially challenging for high-frequency real-time pressure loss estimation (at least 1 Hz). Past literature has presented four estimation methods for the HB fluid, consisting of Zamora and Lord (1974), Merlo et al. (1995), Gjerstad and Time (2015), and the generalized method. However, the recommended practice API RP 13D (2023), “Rheology and Hydraulics of Oilwell Drilling Fluids,” has considered the most traditional Zamora and Lord (1974) as their chosen estimation method for industry use while neglecting to identify the most accurate model. Therefore, to update API RP 13D (2023), this work addresses this shortcoming by investigating the performance of different methods in estimating pressure losses while providing user-friendly, straightforward procedures applicable for field use. To recognize the most accurate estimation method for industry use, different methods’ pressure losses were estimated and compared with the numerical solution as well as experimental data to find the errors. The results showed that the Merlo et al. (1995) method provides the most accurate estimates, with the least average absolute percent error (APE) of maximum 4% underestimating the numerical solution, followed by Zamora and Lord’s error overestimating the numerical solution. The errors may slightly vary depending on the input parameters used, including diameters, mud properties, and circulation rate. The effect of the circulation rate on the accuracy of different methods was also investigated; except for the generalized method, the accuracy of the other methods increases with increasing the circulation rate. This work is a very innovative practical work for finding annular pressure losses accurately without using complex numerical solutions.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Reference27 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3