Abstract
Abstract
The need to develop thin oil reservoirs and heavy oil plays is fast becoming common place in the North Western Shelf (NWS) of Australia. Drilling horizontal multilateral wells is often a requirement to maximise the recovery from a thin oil column and to ensure a field remains economic. Early water coning and heterogeneity uncertainty are problems associated to these reservoir types and it is with the help of Inflow Control Device (ICD) completions that we can combat these issues.
This paper focuses on investigating the technical aspects of multilateral completion design; including packer spacing, ICD calibration, modelling, and upscaling. Of the numerous ICD types that exist, two ICDs (nozzle and spiral) are considered. Using 3D reservoir simulation software, we investigate the effects of calibrating the ICD’s parameters in order to refine a simulation model with historical production data. Methods of upscaling the ICDs to reduce model complexity, computation time and the ability to tune parameters are covered in an attempt to understand the differences and benefits of each ICD type.
Although preset ICD models with default parameters are provided in most simulation packages, ICD calibration using historical data is required in order to achieve a model that can accurately portray the production of a reservoir. It is important that the Reservoir Engineer informs the completions manufacturer about unknown ICD model parameters during the development phase of a field so that an accurate production profile can be created thus avoiding any disappointing outcomes in the future.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献