Affiliation:
1. Apache Corp.
2. Intellicess, Norwegian Research Centre
3. Intellicess
Abstract
Abstract
The first step towards drilling optimization and automation is a reliable data acquisition and handling system. This includes receiving and processing different frequency data across multiple platforms and ensuring proper data quality. Once we implement such a platform, we can build different advisory solutions to improve drilling efficiency and move towards drilling automation. The developed Drilling Intelligence Guide (DIG) already enabled us to achieve the aforementioned goal and access different data (from contextual to high frequency) in real-time.
In the next phase, different models (physical or data analytics) can be built in to optimize various stages of drilling operations. The drilling industry has made significant progress on different physical models that can be run offline (either for pre-job design or post-job analysis) in the previous decades. Given the developed data platform, we can now adopt and run these models in real-time for optimization and automation purposes. As an example, a real-time, computationally efficient hydraulic model that can account for drill string rotation and eccentricity would enable us to monitor ECD (to be used for wellbore stability, kick and lost circulation mitigation) and calculate pump pressure corresponding to different operational conditions (to be used for drill string washout/pump failure prediction and sensor calibration).
The aim of this paper is to show the application of the hydraulic model for real-time monitoring and optimization purposes. An analytical hydraulic model including drill pipe rotation and eccentricity effects is used and compared against transient numerical simulations. In the next step, Pressure While Drilling (PWD) data are used to verify the accuracy of the model for real-time applications. After the verification steps, we explain the process to couple real-time data (e.g., flow rate, RPM), contextual data (e.g., mud properties, BHA and wellbore geometry) and the physical model using field examples. In addition to ECD monitoring at the bit and casing shoe, the real-time hydraulic model can also be used to monitor washout and pump failure events. The application of the model is shown using field examples.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Comparing Drilling Anomaly Prediction by Purely Data-Driven and Hybrid Analysis Methods - Case Study of Utah FORGE Geothermal Wells;Day 3 Thu, March 07, 2024;2024-02-27
2. Prevention of Stuck Pipe Events and Robust Real-Time Identification of Root Cause Using Physics Based Models in Combination with Bayesian Network Models;Day 2 Tue, February 13, 2024;2024-02-12
3. The Secrets to Successful Deployment of AI Drilling Advisory Systems at a Rig Site: A Case Study;Day 1 Mon, October 16, 2023;2023-10-09
4. Maintaining Wellbore Safety: Closed-Loop Limit Control of Tripping Operations;Day 2 Mon, February 20, 2023;2023-03-07
5. Transient Modeling of Tripping Operations Enables Closed-Loop Limit Control of Tripping Processes to Reduce ILT While Maintaining Wellbore Safety;Day 1 Tue, March 07, 2023;2023-03-07