Affiliation:
1. West Virginia University
Abstract
Abstract
This study discusses and compares, from a practical point of view, three different approaches for permeability determination from logs. These are empirical, statistical, and the recently introduced "virtual measurement" methods. They respectively make use of empirically determined models, multiple variable regression, and artificial neural networks. All three methods are applied to well log data from a heterogeneous formation and the results are compared with core permeability, which is considered to be the standard.
In this first part of the paper we present only the model development phase in which we are testing the capability of each method to match the presented data. Based on this, the best two methods are to be analyzed in terms of prediction performance in the second part of this paper.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Improving permeability prediction via Machine Learning in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir: application to Middle Miocene Nullipore, Ras Fanar field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt;Environmental Earth Sciences;2024-04
2. Machine learning approach for core permeability prediction from well logs in Sandstone Reservoir, Mediterranean Sea, Egypt;Journal of Applied Geophysics;2024-01
3. The Economic Valuation of Oak Trees Decline Regions (Quercus brantii .Lindl) in Semi-Mediterranean Zagros Forests Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery;Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology;2023-12-01
4. Empirical, statistical, and connectionist methods coupled with log variables ranking for the prediction of pore network permeability in a heterogeneous oil reservoir;Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources;2022-06-11
5. Petrophysical Evaluation and Geochemical Characterization of Abu Roash F Member Abu Gharadig Basin, Western Desert, Egypt;Day 2 Tue, February 22, 2022;2022-02-21